memeos / x-ray
>_
Token CAX post linkWalletPost text1 credit per new check
X-RAYscanned 1m ago · in 1.3s · 11 on-chain checks · 0 opinionspost on X →
ACR

$ACREVO

Acrevosolana
MC $8.0K-19.1% since first check · 11h ago
Verdict · coin score from chain reads only; narrative compares the website claim against them

CAUTION

X-Ray verdict

Clean contract; linked wallets hold 4.5%.

Total score

37/100

Narrative and on-chain coin, weighed equally.

Insiders hold

4.5%

dev + same-funder wallets

Contract

100/100

riggedlooselocked

3 checks

Holders

45/100

cabalclusteredspread

3 checks

Dev

60/100

serialwatchclean

3 checks

Market

40/100

thinshallowdeep

2 checks

Narrative

20/100

FUD

fudpartlyreal

Coin

53/100

SKETCHY

riggedsketchyok

GAMEFI / NFT

Core claim · not independently verified

“numbered parcels around the landmarks of real cities. Buy them by count in SOL; most of every sale buys $ACREVO for the people who stake land.”

While the $ACREVO token is deployed on Solana, there is no verified evidence of the NFT minting contract or the map-based staking mechanism in the provided facts. On-chain data only confirms a 5-hour-old token with micro-cap liquidity and no verifiable linkage to land-sale revenue distributions.

read from acrevo.world/ ↗
Findings 11✕ 0! 4✓ 7

What would change this

  • →At least 100 holders.
  • →Market cap above $50K.

How X-Ray reads a coin

  • ▸ mint + freeze authority (account read)
  • ▸ top 20 holders, pools separated
  • ▸ first funder of 14 wallets traced
  • ▸ deployer bag, funder and launch history
  • ▸ transfer fee on the mint